Shoppers expect the same things from retailers they always have, including convenience and quality. But it’s seemingly more difficult for retailers to deliver those things now. Why is that? And what can they do to fix it?
For the last 17 years, Zebra’s Global Shopper Study has been a great way to test assumptions – and it can also serve as an early warning signal for retailers and industry observers.
This unique study consistently asks shoppers, retail associates (frontline workers) and retail decision-makers (from store managers to executives) questions like these:
There are dozens of other studies that track retail spending trends, and maybe a few that ask about shopper preferences. But Zebra’s Annual Global Shopper Study is the only one I have found to be a reliable benchmark for shopper, frontline worker, and retailer sentiment on the issues that directly influence retail success.
That’s because this study investigates beyond raw data on consumer satisfaction, frontline workers’ feelings, and retailers’ perceptions. It digs deeper into the causes of year-to-year changes. I look forward to it every year as a key source of retail intelligence. This year was no exception…
The first thing that stuck out to me this year was declining levels of satisfaction of both shoppers and associates, reversing recent trends where overall sentiment had been improving. I cover that and a few of the other key takeaways in this quick video. (While the video is 10 minutes, it’s a far more concise look at the extensive data in the full series of reports, which could easily take hours to comb through.) So, here it goes:
Other areas you might find compelling are concerns around loss prevention struggles, associate stressors, and shopper frustrations.
Of course, beyond the “what,” the next key question is the “why.” One paradox the survey highlights is the following:
Said another way, retailers are working harder to provide better experiences and shoppers are shopping more, but they are less happy while doing so. Where’s the disconnect?
My read of the full results is this: while, yes, retailers have dramatically increased the number of purchase paths and options, one thing that’s brought with it is complexity. All this choice and convenience has an undertone of “inconvenience.”
Some of the conveniences they enjoyed during the pandemic – increased self-checkout options, contactless payment options, easy returns in store (even for online purchases) – are starting to disappear. Because retailers are reporting more losses, they’re trying to more tightly control inventory by locking up items and forcing people to an associate to purchase items. But these things are compelling shoppers to abandon their baskets, if they even have items in there, and walk out empty handed. Shoppers have seen how easy it can be to shop and aren’t happy with retailers who are trying to take those conveniences away.
What’s making matters worse is that retailers aren’t properly staffed to open more checkout lanes, more customer service registers, or respond to more customer calls for in-aisle assistance. Time is money, and people know they can go elsewhere and get the same items for the same price, so why wait?
They cannot conveniently pull up current product or pricing information on their mobile devices when a customer asks for assistance. They must track down a supervisor or colleague for assistance with basic tasks, or to even figure out which tasks they should be focusing on each shift. Which shelves need restocking? Are the shelf labels correct? Where’s the product they need to restock? How do they get new labels printed to fix signage and labels?
Many say that information isn’t readily available and, if it is, it isn’t as accessible as they feel it should be on their mobile devices (if they even have mobile devices to use in this capacity). The fact that associates have no real-time visibility into out-of-stocks unless they physically walk the store to investigate shelf condition or stockroom inventory is a problem. Not only because it’s inconvenient for them, but because it negatively impacts shoppers’ experiences in many ways. Online orders may not be completely fulfilled, and in-store customers may have to settle with a substitution or else make another stop to get what they need.
Something else associates find inconvenient: Even if they have access to task lists on their devices, they don’t always know how to prioritize those tasks as new issues or requests pop up, or they don’t always know how to do those tasks. So, they have to chase someone down, which isn’t convenient if they can’t simply push a button on their headset or mobile device to reach the person who has the answers. Once they know what to do, how much effort does it take to track down products, get new signage or labels printed, and then get them in the right place?
So, communications, task prioritization, and task execution…all very inconvenient for most retail frontline workers right now. They also don’t like that they can’t be as helpful to customers as they want to be, which is a knock on morale and contributing to shoppers’ dissatisfaction with retailers.
There are many growing challenges that, if you think about it, are really stemming from the inconvenience of identifying, communicating, or responding to issues.
For example, 85% of retail decision-makers feel operation managers are spending too much time managing the workforce. Well, I would argue that’s because it’s not as convenient as it could be for them to access, create, or update schedules, assign tasks, or communicate with frontline associates. Apparently, I’m onto something given that around eight in 10 decision-makers say it’s consistently difficult for store staff to find help or ask for timely support, and it’s regularly challenging to get the right communications to the right people or for managers to easily determine whether essential work has been completed. They say they rely on multiple communication channels, which causes confusion and a lack of priority.
Communications problems certainly cause inconvenience for people, as no one wants action to be delayed because calls for help or valuable information can’t reach the right people quick enough.
Even these comments, which were made by more than eight in 10 retailers surveyed this year, indicate that it needs to be more convenient for retailers and their frontline teams to collect, analyze, understand, and action job-related information:
They also need technology system design, deployment, and management to be easier. This is the reason why they say, “My organization prefers to select a technology vendor or supplier who offers both hardware and software solutions.” They don’t want to have to go knock on two separate doors to get the hardware and software. They want to find everything they need behind one door, and they want to be able to call on one person or one team to help them optimize and troubleshoot.
Now that you understand what people generally feel about the current state of retail, you can start building a list of the things that could be more convenient for you, your frontline teams, and shoppers. Then we can sit down together and start mapping out ways to more strategically use the technology tools we have available so you all can get what you really need from the modern store experience.
With the advanced state of technology today, friction is a choice – there are ways to eliminate it. It’s simply going to take a little bit of joint investigation to understand why exactly everyone is feeling a little concerned and frustrated right now – to uncover those root causes. Once we know why things aren’t working as well as they should, it won’t be difficult to fix them. There are plenty of technologies we can pull out of our toolbox to get retail operations running smoothly and satisfy everyone’s expectations.
Here are some of them.
Is Convenience the Key to Achieving an Elevated Shopping Experience?
According to one retail industry observer (and nearly every shopper), the answer is “yes!” Convenience is what drives satisfaction with retailers. Find out which conveniences matter most, though. It may not be the ones you think.
Though meant to reduce theft, locking up products in your stores may be causing losses by deterring impatient shoppers from completing their purchase or complicating inventory management. Consider this instead.
The traditional 1D barcode scanner isn’t going to help you see and intervene when losses occur at the point of sale (POS). Nor will it reduce the number of interventions required by retail store associates or restaurant workers. But retail leader Mark Thomson has seen something that will. He explains in his latest blog post.
Is Generative AI Really Going to Change the Retail Experience as Some Experts Claim?
Consumers and retail associates who participated in Zebra's 16th Annual Global Shopper Study hope AI will change the retail experience, and top AI engineers think gen AI will change the retail experience. But how? That's what Zebra's EMEA Retail Industry Leader, Mark Thomson, and Zebra's Senior Director of AI and Advanced Applications, Stuart Hubbard, share in this latest blog post, which includes a very candid video chat about where the greatest potential for gen AI is proving to be in retail right now.